Evidence-Based, Empirically Supported, or Scientifically Unsupported? An Overview of the Research to Practice Gap in Early Childhood Special Education

Sara Movahedazarhouligh

Abstract


Valid research is crucial for evaluating the effects of utilized practices, strategies, and interventions on learners with exceptionalities. In the United States, for the past several decades, considerable research and policies have focused on developing evidence-based practices (EBPs), evidence-informed programs, and other research-supported initiatives that intend to produce better outcomes for children with disabilities. However, past and current efforts to translate, transport, and close the research to practice gap have not successfully disseminated the growing list of evidence-based interventions, strategies, and programs routinely into practice. The gap between research and practice is particularly problematic in special education and early childhood special education (ECSE). Children and students with disabilities require highly effective instruction to reach their potential. This conceptual review paper provides an overview of EBPs in ECSE and elaborates on the research to practice gap and the related issues. The paper discusses the identification, implementation, and dissemination of EBPs that have been regarded as the challenges the field of ECSE faces in closing the research to practice gap. Finally, implications and recommendations for future research, practice, and policy are discussed.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Artman-Meeker, K., Fettig, A., Barton, E. E., Penney, A., & Zeng, S. (2015). Applying an evidence-based framework to the early childhood coaching literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415595550

Azzi-Lessing, L. (2011). Home visitation programs: Critical issues and future directions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(4), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.03.005

Barton, E., & Smith, B. J. (2015). The preschool inclusion toolbox: How to build and lead a high-quality program. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

Best Evidence Encyclopedia. (n.d.). Top-rated programs. Best Evidence Encyclopedia. http://www.bestevidence.org/reading/strug/top.htm

Buysse, V., Wesley, P. W., Snyder, P., & Winton, P. (2006). Evidence-based practice: What does it mean for the early childhood field? Young Exceptional Children, 9(4), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/109625060600900401

Cook, B.G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation of science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900201

Cook, Bryan G. (2014). A call for examining replication and bias in special education research. Remedial and Special Education, 35(4), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528995

Cook, Bryan G., Collins, L. W., Cook, S. C., & Cook, L. (2016). A replication by any other name: A systematic review of replicative intervention studies. Remedial and Special Education, 37(4), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516637198

Cook, Bryan G., Cook, L., & Landrum, T. J. (2013). Moving research into practice: Can we make dissemination stick? Exceptional Children, 79(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900203

Cook, Bryan, G., & Cook, S. C. (2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 47(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466911420877

Cook, Bryan G., Tankersley, M., & Landrum, T. J. (2009). Determining evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 75(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500306

Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (3rd ed.). National Academies Press.

Division for Early Childhood. (, 2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education in 2014. http://www.dec-sped.org/recommend- practices

Drummond, J. E., Weir, A. E., & Kysela, G. M. (2002). Home visitation practice: Models, documentation, and evaluation. Public Health Nursing (Boston, Mass.), 19(1), 21–29.

Dunst, Carl J., & Trivette, C. M. (2009). Using research evidence to inform and evaluate early childhood intervention practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 40–52.

Dunst, Carl J., Trivette, C. M., & Raab, M. (2013). An implementation science framework for conceptualizing and operationalizing fidelity in early childhood intervention studies. Journal of Early Intervention, 35(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815113502235

Dunst, C.J., Bruder, M. B., & Espe-Sherwindt, M. (2014). Family capacity-building in early childhood intervention: Do context and setting matter? School Community Journal, 24(1).

Eccles, M. P., & Mittman, B. S. (2006). Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1

Glasgow, R., Vog, T., & Boles, S. (2000). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322–1327. http://dx.doi.org/10 .2105/AJPH.89.9.1322

Harn, B., Parisi, D., & Stoolmiller, M. (2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we know about the fidelity of implementation in schools? Exceptional Children, 79(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900204

Hebbeler, Spiker, D., & Kahn, L. (2012). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act’s early childhood programs: Powerful vision and pesky details. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 199–207.

Herman, R., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., Redding, S., & Darwin, M. (2008). Turning around chronically low-performing schools: A practice guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, NCEE #2008-4020.

Kelly, B., & Perkins, D. F. (2012). Handbook of implementation science for psychology in education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Korfmacher, J., Green, B., Staerkel, F., Peterson, C., Cook, G., Roggman, L., Faldowski, R. A., & Schiffman, R. (2008). Parent involvement in early childhood home visiting. Child & Youth Care Forum, 37(4), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-008-9057-3

Mandell, D. S., Stahmer, A. C., Shin, S., Xie, M., Reisinger, E., & Marcus, S. C. (2013). The role of treatment fidelity on outcomes during a randomized field trial of autism intervention. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 17(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361312473666

Moster, M. P., & Crockett, J. B. (1999). Reclaiming the history of special education for more effective practice. Exceptionality, 8(2), 133–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX0802_4

Nelson, S. R., Leffler, J. C., & Hansen, B. A. (2009). Toward a research agenda for understanding and improving the use of research evidence. Portland, OR: North- West Regional Educational Laboratory. http://educationnorthwest.org/webfm_send/311

Odom, S. L. (2009). The tie that binds evidence-based practice, implementation science, and outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121408329171

Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R. H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100201

Pashler, H., Bain, P. M., Bottge, B. A., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M., & Metcalfe, J. (2007). Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning IES Practice Guide. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, NCER 2007- 2004.

Peterson, C. A., Luze, G. J., Eshbaugh, E. M., Jeon, H.-J., & Kantz, K. R. (2007). Enhancing parent-child interactions through home visiting: Promising practice or unfulfilled promise? Journal of Early Intervention, 29(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510702900205

Promising Practices Network. (n.d.). Direct instruction. Promising Practices Network. http://www.promisingpractices.net/program. asp?programmed = 146

Reichow, B. (2016). Evidence-Based Practice in the Context of Early Childhood Special Education. In Handbook of Early Childhood Special Education. Springer International Publishing.

Roggman, L. A., Boyce, L. K., Cook, G. A., & Jump, V. K. (2001). Inside home visits: A collaborative look at process and quality. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(01)00085-0

Rush, D. D., & Shelden, M. L. (2011). The early childhood coaching handbook. Brookes Publishing Co.

Russo-Campisi, J. (2017). Evidence-based practices in special education: Current assumptions and future considerations. Child & Youth Care Forum, 46(2), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-017-9390-5

Sackett, D., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J., Haynes, R., & Richardson, W. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj .312.7023.71

Snyder, P. A., Hemmeter, M. L., & Fox, L. (2015). Supporting implementation of evidence-based practices through practice-based coaching. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(3), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415594925

Strain, P. S. (2018). Personal thoughts on early childhood special education research: An historical perspective, threats to relevance, and call to action. Journal of Early Intervention, 1053815117750411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815117750411

Thurlow, M. L., Foster, C., & Rogers, C. M. (2010). Scientifically supported interventions. Current issues and trends in special education: Identification, assessment, and instruction (Vol. 19). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Tseng, V. (2012). The uses of research in policy and practice. Social Policy Repour, 26(2). http://www.srcd.org/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=232&Itemid=658

What Works Clearinghouse. (, 2009). WWC Intervention Report: Adolescent Literacy-Success Makers. Institute of education sciences.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.51383/jesma.2022.23